Bir Bahadur Choudhary @ Bir Bahadur v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.88096 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-667 Year-2024 Thana- SASARAM NAGAR District- Rohtas ====================================================== Bir Bahadur Choudhary @ Bir Bahadur S/O Dhaneshwar Choudhary R/o Village-Kusudhi, P.S.-Darigaon, District- Rohtas ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Jai Prakash Singh, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr. Shahabuddin Azeem @ S. Azeem, A.P.P.
====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER 08-01-2025
1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State.
2. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 191(2), 191(3), 190, 126(2), 115(2), 118(1), 117(2), 109, 329(4), 303(2), 74, 352, 351(3) of the B.N.S. 2023 and 27 of the Arms Act.
3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner has antecedent of one case and from perusal of the allegation as alleged in the FIR, it would manifest that on account of dispute relating to land, the occurrence is alleged to have taken place. It is further submitted that altogether 28 persons have been made accused in the instant FIR including the petitioner. It is next submitted that allegation of assaulting the side of the informant is specific against the named accused persons and as far as this petitioner is concerned, he is alleged to
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.88096 of 2024(2) dt.08-01-2025 2/2 have fired but then no one received any firearm injury. It is also submitted that on account of dispute relating to land and to give seriousness to the case allegation of firing has been alleged.
4. Learned A.P.P. for the State opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner.
5. Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, let the petitioner above-named, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of six weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty-five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned court below where the case is pending/successor court in connection with Sasaram (T) P.S. Case No. 667 of 2024, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 482(2) of the BNSS.
(Satyavrat Verma, J) Kundan/- U T