Avinash Kumar @ Abhinash Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.84210 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-124 Year-2025 Thana- MALI District- Aurangabad ====================================================== Avinash Kumar @ Abhinash Kumar Son of Pintu Singh Resident of Village - Sori, P.S.- Mali, District - Aurangabad (Bihar) ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Sanjay Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Syed Ehteshamuddin, A.P.P.

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 04-12-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State.

2. The petitioner seeks bail in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 103(1), 61(2) and 3(5) of the B.N.S., 2023 and Section 27 of the Arms Act.

3. As per the prosecution case, the informant suspects that all the named accused persons, including this petitioner, committed the murder of his son because of old animosity. It is alleged that two days prior to the occurrence, this petitioner had threatened the informant to kill his son.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the informant is not an eye-witness to the occurrence. The petitioner has been made an accused in this case only on suspicion due to old animosity. During investigation, no material has come to indicate

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.84210 of 2025(2) dt.04-12-2025 2/2 his involvement in the alleged offence. Similarly situated coaccused Uday Singh @ Uday Kumar Singh @ Uday Kumar, having similar and identical allegations, has already been granted bail by this Court vide order dated 20.11.2025 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 29261 of 2025. The petitioner is in custody since 30.08.2025 and the charge-sheet has been submitted in this case and he claims clean antecedent.

5. Learned A.P.P. for the State vehemently opposed the prayer for grant of bail to the petitioner.

6. Considering the nature of accusation and the period of custody, the prayer for grant of bail to the petitioner is allowed.

7. Accordingly, let the above-named petitioner be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned C.J.M., Aurangabad, in connection with Mali P.S. Case No. 124 of 2025.

(Prabhat Kumar Singh, J) Neha/- U T