Shahzad Alam v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.85392 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-200 Year-2025 Thana- MADHUBAN District- East Champaran ====================================================== Shahzad Alam Son of Tilae Miya @ Tilai Miya Resident of Village- Har Narain, P.S.- Sikarganj, District- East Champaran (Motihari) ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner :

Mr. Sanjay Kumar S.K., Advocate For the State :

Mr. Nitya Nand Tiwary, APP For the Informant :

Mr. Jay Ram Prasad, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 09-12-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned A.P.P. for the State and learned counsel appearing on behalf of the informant.

2. The petitioner seeks bail in a case registered for the offence punishable under Sections 103(1) and 3(5) of the B.N.S. and Section 27 of the Arms Act.

3. As per prosecution case, on 12.06.2025 at about 7:30 PM, three unknown miscreants riding on an Apache motorcycle shot in the chest and stomach of the father of informant due to which, father of informant died on the spot.

4. It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that petitioner is quite innocent and has committed no offence. From bare perusal of the F.I.R. it is apparent that petitioner is

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.85392 of 2025(2) dt.09-12-2025 2/2 not named in the F.I.R.. Name of petitioner transpired in this case during course of investigation, in the confessional statement of co-accused person. Save and except confessional statement, there is no material on record to show the complicity of this petitioner in the alleged offence. Moreover, charge-sheet has already been submitted and petitioner, having no criminal antecedents, is in custody since 22.06.2025.

5. Learned A.P.P. for the State and learned counsel appearing on behalf of the informant have vehemently opposed the prayer for grant of bail to the petitioner.

6. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, general and omnibus nature of accusation, period of custody and clean antecedents of the petitioner, the prayer for grant bail of to the petitioner is allowed.

7. Accordingly, let the above named petitioner be released on bail on furnishing bail-bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned A.C.J.M.-VI, East Champaran, Motihari in connection with Madhuban P.S. Case No. 200 of 2025. (Prabhat Kumar Singh, J) shashank/- U T