Dewanti Devi v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.5216 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-865 Year-2023 Thana- FORBESGANJ District- Araria ====================================================== Mithu Paswan Son Of Sinod Paswan Resident Of Vill- Idgah, Ward No- 14, P.S.- Forbesganj, Distt- Araria ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar BIHAR ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== with CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No. 9388 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-865 Year-2023 Thana- FORBESGANJ District- Araria ====================================================== Dewanti Devi Wife Of Sinod Paswan Resident Of Village - Idgah, Ward No.14, Police Station - Forbesganj, District - Araria ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State Of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
(In CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No. 5216 of 2024) For the Petitioner/s :
Mr.Ashok Kumar Singh, Advocate For the State :
Mr.Rajendra Nath Jha, APP (In CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No. 9388 of 2024) For the Petitioner/s :
Mr.Ashok Kumar Singh, Advocate For the State :
Mr.Md. Mushtaque Alam, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP KUMAR ORAL ORDER 09-04-2024 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned APP for the State.
2. The petitioners seek bail in connection with Forbesganj P.S. Case No. 865 of 2023 registered for the offence punishable under Sections 302 and 201/34 of the Indian Penal Code.
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.5216 of 2024(3) dt.09-04-2024 2/2
3. The petitioners are mother and son who have killed the paramour of the mother by strangulating him. The dead body was found on the boundary wall of the petitioners. They are in jail since 14.09.2023.
4. Learned APP appearing for the State opposes the prayer for regular bail of the petitioner.
5. Since the petitioners are involved in the killing of the deceased, I am not inclined to grant bail to the petitioners.
6. Accordingly, these applications stand dismissed. (Sandeep Kumar, J) P. Kumar U T