← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./685/2025bail granted

Bittu Bhagat @ Gorakh Maali v. The State Of Bihar

2025-01-20Mr. Justice R. P. Mishra2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.685 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-647 Year-2023 Thana- ARA NAWADA District- Bhojpur ====================================================== Bittu Bhagat @ Gorakh Maali S/o Late Umesh Maali R/o Village- Gosganj, P.S- Ara Town, District- Bhojpur ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Rajendra Nath Sinha, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Ms. Pushpa Sinha, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RUDRA PRAKASH MISHRA ORAL ORDER 20-01-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2.

The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Ara Nawada P.S. Case No. 647 of 2023 instituted for the offence under Section 392 of the Indian Penal Code.

3.

As per prosecution case, informant was accosted with two unknown miscreants who have assaulted him and snatched his mobile phone and golden chain.

4.

It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that the petitioner is in custody since 01-07-2024. Petitioner bears one criminal antecedent, as per disclosure made in paragraph No. 3 of the bail application.

5.

It has been further submitted by the petitioner's

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.685 of 2025(2) dt.20-01-2025 2/2 counsel that petitioner has been falsely implicated in the present case. Petitioner is not even named in the FIR and his name has surfaced in this case during course of investigation. Noting incriminating has been recovered from the possession of the petitioner. It is submitted that charge sheet has been submitted in this case. There is no compliance of Section 100 of the Cr.P.C. 6.

Learned A.P.P. for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer for grant of bail to the petitioner. 7.

Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, period of custody of the petitioner and manner of petitioner's implication, this Court is inclined to grant bail to the petitioner.

8.

Let the petitioner be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Court below/concerned Court in connection with Nawada P.S. Case No. 647 of 2023.

(Rudra Prakash Mishra, J) Raj Kishore/- U T