Amit Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.87247 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-130 Year-2024 Thana- NARHATT District- Nawada ====================================================== Amit Kumar son of Suresh Prasad @ Kamlesh Chaudhary R/o VillagePandey Bigha, P.S.- Narhat, Dist.- Nawada ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Birendra Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Ms.Renu Kumari, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH KUMAR VERMA ORAL ORDER 13-02-2025 Heard Mr.Birendra Kumar, learned counsel for the petitioner and Ms.Renu Kumari, learned A.P.P. for the State.

2. The petitioner seeks bail, who is in custody since 24.05.2024 in connection with S.Tr.No.534/2024 arising out of Narhat P.S. Case No. 130 of 2024, F.I.R. dated 27.03.2024 registered for the offence punishable under Sections 304(B)/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

3. Allegation against the petitioner is that he alongwith other co-accused persons have in furtherance of their common intention committed the dowry death of the daughter of the informant.

4. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has clean antecedent. He has falsely been implicated in the present case merely on the ground that the petitioner is husband of the deceased. The allegation as alleged in the FIR is false and fabricated and the petitioner has not

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.87247 of 2024(4) dt.13-02-2025 2/2 committed any offence as alleged in the FIR. In fact the deceased died due to falling from roof and subsequently she has died.

5. The learned APP for the State, on the other hand, has vehemently opposed the prayer for bail of the petitioner and submits that there is sufficient material has come during investigation against the petitioner which suggests that he has involved in the present crime in question and apart from that, report of the learned Trial Court reveals that the charge has been framed recently on 12.12.2024.

6. In view of the submission of learned APP for the State as well as report of the learned Trial Court, I am not inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail in connection with S.Tr.No.534/2024 arising out of Narhat P.S. Case No. 130 of 2024 pending in the court of learned Addl. Sessions Judge-IV, Nawada.

7. Prayer is refused.

8. However, the learned Trial Court is directed to expedite the trial and conclude the same at the earliest. (Rajesh Kumar Verma, J) Nitesh/- U T