Manzur Saifi v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.83864 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-345 Year-2025 Thana- UCHKAGAON District- Gopalganj ====================================================== Manzur Saifi Son of Nizam Saifi Resident Of Village- Kaithwaliya Ps -Uchagaon, District -Gopalganj ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Md. Danish Quamar, Adv.
Ms. Madiha Moneer, Adv.
Mr. Rajiv Kumar, Adv.
For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr. Binod Kumar, A.P.P.
====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN KUMAR JHA ORAL ORDER 09-12-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State.
2. In the present case, the petitioner seeks bail in connection with Uchkagaon P.S. Case No. 345 of 2025, registered for the offences under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 109(1), 117(1), 352 and 351(3) of the BNS.
3. As per the prosecution case, the petitioner assaulted the informant with iron rod causing injuries on his head and other parts of the body.
4. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner submits that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in this case as there is previous dispute between the parties. The informant is paternal uncle of the petitioner and he wants to
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.83864 of 2025(2) dt.09-12-2025 2/3 grab the land of the petitioner which was allotted to the father of the petitioner in family partition. The FIR has been lodged after delay of five days without any explanation and this shows the falsity of the allegation. Though the allegation is of hitting the informant with iron rod, one of the injuries is an incised wound and this contradicts the allegation of inflicting injuries by hard and blunt object. One of the injuries is dislocation of shoulder joint and a lacerated wound of size 1/2"x1/2"x1/6" on left parietal region of the skull. The injuries are not serious however one injury is an incised wound on left fronto parietal region of skull of size 3"x1/3"x1/6 for which there is no allegation against the petitioner. The petitioner is having no criminal antecedent. The petitioner is in custody since 30.09.2025.
5. Learned A.P.P. appearing for the State opposes the submission made on behalf of the petitioner. Learned A.P.P. submits that there is allegation against the petitioner for causing injuries on the head of the informant which is a vital part and the injury might have proved fatal.
6. Having regard to the fact and circumstances and submission made on behalf of the parties and considering the relationship between the parties, the nature of injuries and also considering the clean antecedent of the petitioner and his period
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.83864 of 2025(2) dt.09-12-2025 3/3 of custody, the petitioner is directed to be released on bail, on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand Only) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned ACJM-I, Gopalganj/concerned court, in connection with Uchkagaon P.S. Case No. 345 of 2025, subject to the condition laid down under Section 480(3) of the BNSS and other following conditions:
(i) One of the bailors will be a close relative of the petitioner.
(ii) The petitioner will remain present on each and every date fixed by the court below, if so required by the learned trial court.
(iii) In case of absence on three consecutive dates or in violation of the terms of the bail, the bail bond of the petitioner will be liable to be cancelled by the court concerned.
(Arun Kumar Jha, J) Anuradha/- U T