Raju Kumar v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.85487 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-635 Year-2024 Thana- FATEHPUR District- Gaya ====================================================== Raju Kumar S/o Rooplal Paswan Resident of Village- Jaheli Bigha, P.S.- Fatehpur, District- Gaya ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Onkar Nath, Adv.
For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr. Rajendra Singh, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE HARISH KUMAR ORAL ORDER 24-12-2025 Heard learned Advocate for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.
2. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in connection with Fatehpur P.S. Case No.635 of 2024 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 74, 76, 117(2), 109, 303(2), 351(2), 352 and 3(5) of the BNS.
3. While the informant had gone to collect grass, in the meanwhile, this petitioner tried to outrage her modesty and when this fact was brought to the knowledge of her husband, he made a protest and tried to persuade the petitioner, whereupon the petitioner assaulted him by means of iron rod due to which he sustained serious injuries. It is further alleged that the family members of the petitioner also assaulted the informant and her husband by means of khanti, iron rod and bricks, besides the
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.85487 of 2025(2) dt.24-12-2025 2/3 allegation of snatching of valuables.
4. Learned Advocate for the petitioner contended that the present case is nothing but a counter blast to Gaya SC/ST P.S. Case No.52 of 2024 instituted on 04.10.2024. After having come to know about the institution of the afore-noted case, the informant has instituted the present case on 06.10.2024 with regard to an occurrence which took place on 30.09.2024. So far the injuries which are allegedly sustained to the informant's husband is concerned, the same is found to be simple in nature, as is evident from the impugned order. The petitioner is a Constable in CRPF and carrying fair antecedent. He undertakes that he will fully cooperate in the proceeding of the Court.
5. On the other hand, learned Advocate for the State vehemently opposed the bail application.
6. Having considered the submissions set forth by the learned Advocate for the respective parties and taking note of the factum of case and counter case, coupled with the nature of accusation qua the simple injury, besides the fair antecedent of the petitioner, let the above named petitioner, be released on bail, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of four weeks from today, on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.85487 of 2025(2) dt.24-12-2025 3/3 sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned C.J.M., Gaya in connection with Fatehpur P.S. Case No.635 of 2024, subject to the condition as laid down under Section 482(2) of the BNSS, with further condition that one of the bailors shall be the own/close family members of the petitioner. (Harish Kumar, J) rohit/- U T