Murshid Alam @ Md Murshid v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.68320 of 2018 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-517 Year-2018 Thana- KISHANGANJ District- Kishanganj ====================================================== Murshid Alam @ Md Murshid Son of Md. Akhtar Ali Resident of VillagePahari Chowk Churi Patti, P.S.+District- Kishanganj. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Ram Prawesh Kumar For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Sri Surendra Prasad Singh ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S. KUMAR ORAL ORDER 22-11-2018 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State.

The petitioner, who is in custody, seeks bail in connection with Kishanganj P.S. Case No. 517 of 2018 registered for the offence punishable under Sections 307, 34 of the Indian Penal Code and 27 of Arms Act.

Informant has alleged that some unknown persons were quarreling outside his shop and when he came out of the shop, they started indiscriminate firing and he went back into the shop and closed the shutter and when after ten minutes he came back, unknown miscreants had fled. Petitioner has been apprehended in this case on the basis of suspicion. Petitioner is also accused in another case bearing Kishanganj P.S. Case No. 379 of 2018 under Sections 379, 506, 504 of the Indian Penal

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.68320 of 2018(2) dt.22-11-2018 2/2 Code, in which he is on bail. Petitioner is in custody since 14.08.2018.

Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, let the petitioner named above be released on bail upon furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Kishanganj, in connection with Kishanganj P.S. Case No. 517 of 2018 subject to the conditions that:-

(1) Bailors should be local having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the court concerned.

(2) Petitioner shall co-operate in the trial and shall be properly represented on each and every date fixed by the court and his absence on two consecutive dates without proper and sufficient reason the trial court will be at liberty to cancel his bail bond.

(3) If the petitioner tampers with the evidence or the witnesses of the case, in that case, prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail of the petitioner.

(S. Kumar, J) veena/- U T