Patna High CourtCR. MISC./84536/2025allowed

Binod Ray @ Vinod Ray v. The State Of Bihar

2026-01-31Mr. Justice Sandeep Kumar2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.84536 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-410 Year-2024 Thana- MOTIPUR District- Muzaffarpur ====================================================== Binod Ray @ Vinod Ray S/o Mahendra Ray R/o Village - Purani Bazar, Motipur, P.S - Motipur, District - Muzaffarpur ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Sunil Kumar Pandey For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Damodar Prasad Tiwary Mr. Raju Kumar Mr. Abhash Mr. Pradhan Murli Manohar Pd ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP KUMAR ORAL ORDER 31-01-2026 Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner, learned APP for the State and the learned counsel for the informant.

2. This is the 2nd attempt of the petitioner for regular bail in connection with Sessions Trial No. 477 of 2025 arising out of Motipur P.S. Case No. 410 of 2024 registered for the offence under Sections 115(2) and 109 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and Section 25(1-B)a, 26, 27 and 35 of the Arms Act. Earlier the bail application of the petitioner was rejected on 12.05.2025 in Cr. Misc. No. 21707 of 2025.

3. As per the prosecution case, the petitioner is said to have fired at the informant which caused him injury in his chest.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.84536 of 2025(2) dt.31-01-2026 2/2 petitioner is innocent and has not committed any offence. Petitioner is in custody since 04.12.2024. He further submits that the witnesses are not appearing in the trial.

5. Learned counsel for the informant has vehemently opposed the prayer for bail but he has not been able to explain as to why the witnesses are not appearing in the Court and because of that, the trial is being delayed.

6. Considering the period of custody and the delay in the trial, this application for regular bail is allowed.

7. Accordingly, let the petitioner, above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten Thousand)with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Additional Sessions Judge-2nd, Muzaffarpur/concerned Court below in connection with Sessions Trial No. 477 of 2025 arising out of Motipur P.S. Case No. 410 of 2024 subject to condition that:- (i). The petitioner shall appear in the trial regularly either personally or through his lawyer and shall cooperate in the trial and noncooperation in the trial shall result in cancellation of the bail bond of the petitioner. (Sandeep Kumar, J) Shishir/- U T