Lallan Prasad Yadav @ Lalan Prasad Yadav v. The State Of Bihar Through Sri Amir Subhani

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.3628 of 2023 In Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.9328 of 2020 ====================================================== 1.

Lallan Prasad Yadav @ Lalan Prasad Yadav son of Late Rambhajan Yadav @ Ram Bhajan Yadav, resident of village- Siknarpur, P.O. Lahsuns, P.S. Masaurih, District - Patna, presently residing at Mohalla - New Etwarpur, Ram Jankipath, Kurthaur, P.S. Parsa, District - Patna. 2.

Ramkrishna Singh, son of Late Mithila Saran Singh, resident of village - Naya Tola, Goraiya Sthan, P.S. Maner, District - Patna. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar through Sri Amir Subhani (male), son of not known to the petitioners presently posted as the Chief Secretary, Government of Bihar, Patna.

2.

Sri Brijesh Mehrotra son of not known to the petitioner presently posted as the Additional Chief Secretary, Revenue and Land Reforms Department, Government of Bihar, Patna.

3.

Sri Akhilesh Jain, son of not known to the petitioner presently posted as the Chairman, Bihar State Religious Trust Board, Vidyapati Marg, Patna. ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Pankaj Kumar Singh, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Dhurjati Kumar Prasad, GP 14 Mrs. Jahan Ara, AC to GP 14 For the BSRTB :

`Mr. Shekhar Singh, Sr. Advocate Mr. Sumit Kumar, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PURNENDU SINGH ORAL ORDER 19-09-2025 Heard learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners and learned counsel appearing on behalf of the respondents.

2. In view of the statement and information contained in paragraph no.6 to 8 of the show cause filed on behalf of the opposite parties no. 3, the order under contempt appears to have been complied.

Patna High Court MJC No.3628 of 2023(3) dt.19-09-2025 2/2 3 However, the petitioners if still aggrieved in any manner, they would at be liberty to challenge the same before the appropriate authority.

4. The present contempt petition, accordingly, stands consigned.

(Purnendu Singh, J) Sanjay/- U