← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./87482/2024dismissed

Shiva Paswan @ Shivam Paswan v. The State Of Bihar

2026-02-09Mr. Justice Sandeep Kumar2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.87482 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-181 Year-2023 Thana- BALIYA District- Begusarai ====================================================== Shiva Paswan @ Shivam Paswan S/o Suresh Paswan @ Gopal Paswan Resident of Village- Chhoti Ballia, Akhtiyarpur Ward No 14, PS- Ballia, District- Begusarai ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar 2.

Lalita Devi W/O Manoj Paswan R/O Chhoti Baliya Akhtiyarpir Ward no. 14 P.S. Baliya Dist Begusarai ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Rahul Singh, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Nawal Kishore Prasad, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP KUMAR ORAL ORDER 09-02-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.

2. This is the second attempt on behalf of the petitioner for grant of bail in connection with S.T. Case No.300 of 2024, arising out of Ballia P.S. Case No.181 of 2023, registered for the offence under Sections 147, 148, 341, 323, 324, 504, 307, 379 of the I.P.C. and section 27 of the Arms Act.

3. Earlier the bail application of the petitioner has been rejected vide order dated 21.06.2024 passed in Cr. Misc. No.30915 of 2024.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that from the report of the Trial Court it appears that five witnesses have

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.87482 of 2024(6) dt.09-02-2026 2/2 been examined till date.

5. Mr. Roop Kishan, learned Counsel for the informant submits that remaining witnesses will be examined on the date fixed. From the report it appears that out of remaining witnesses, there are some official witnesses also.

6. Considering the gravity of the offence and the fact that the trial has progressed, I am not inclined to review my earlier order.

7. Accordingly, the application stands dismissed.

8. The Superintendent of Police, Begusarai is directed to ensure the appearance of the remaining witnesses in the trial and the informant is also directed to produce the private witnesses, so that the trial is not delayed.

9. Let a copy of this order be communicated to the Superintendent of Police, Begusarai forthwith through FAX or E-mail for its compliance.

(Sandeep Kumar, J) mdrashid/- U T