← Library
Patna High CourtMJC/4329/2018disposed

Shiva Shankar Choudhary v. The State Of Bihar

2026-04-23Mr. Justice Rajiv Roy2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.4329 of 2018 In Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.5638 of 2015 ====================================================== Shiva Shankar Choudhary son of Late Nand Kishore Choudhary resident of Village Lagma (Rambhadrapur) P.S. Tardih, District- Darbhanga. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State Of Bihar 2.

Dr. Awadh Kishore Roy, Vice Chancellor, B.N. Mandal University, Madhepura.

3.

Col. Neeraj Kumar, Registrar, B.N. Mandal University, Madhepura. 4.

Dr Maya Sharan Pathak, the Finance Officer, B.N. Mandal University, Madhepura.

5.

R.K. Mahajan, Principal Secretary, Human Resources Development Department, Govt. of Bihar, Patna.

... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

M/s Binodanand Mishra, Soumya Sinha, Advocates For the U n i v e r s i t y :

M/s Rakesh Kr, Rajni Kant Singh, Advocates For the S t a t e :

Mr Vijay Kr Mishra, AC to AAG XV ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV ROY ORAL ORDER 23-04-2026 Learned counsel for the petitioner undertakes to remove the defect, as pointed out by the office. 2 Heard Ms Soumya Sinha, learned counsel for the petitioner and the State as also the University. 3 The present MJC has been filed for the following reliefs:

"... ... ... for initiation of contempt of Court proceeding, conviction and award of appropriate sentence to the Opposite Parties, as they willfully and deliberately disobeyed the order and direction of this Hon'ble Court dated

Patna High Court MJC No.4329 of 2018(4) dt.23-04-2026 2/2 09.05.2016 passed in CWJC No 5638 of 2015 by Hon'ble Mr Justice Shivaji Pandey."

4 A show case has come on behalf of the B N Mandal University showing that all the payments have been made. 5 Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner still has some grievance relating to the interest for which liberty be granted.

6 The said liberty is always there to the litigant, much less the petitioner.

7 With the aforesaid observation, MJC No 4329 of 2018 is disposed of.

8 Before parting, this Court would like to put on record its word of appreciation for Ms Soumya Sinha, Advocate for her proper assistance rendered in the matter. (Rajiv Roy, J) M.E.H./- U