Pintu Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.84951 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-160 Year-2025 Thana- BHAGWANGANJ District- Patna ====================================================== Pintu Kumar, Son of Late Surjan Singh, Resident of Village- Daulatpur, P.S.- Bhagwanganj, District- Patna ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Ajay Kumar Sinha, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Mohammed Arif, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR PANDEY ORAL ORDER 16-12-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner has prayed for bail in connection with Bhagwanganj P.S. Case No.160 of 2025 registered for the offence punishable under Sections 20(b)(ii)B and 8A (c) of the N.D.P.S. Act.

3. The case of the prosecution, in short, is that this petitioner started fleeing away when the police team reached to search his house. After that, he was apprehended and from his house, altogether 6.450 Kg. of ganja was recovered.

4. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner has submitted that petitioner is innocent and has committed no offence. He has been falsely implicated in this case. It has further been submitted that the house is joint one and half portion of that

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.84951 of 2025(2) dt.16-12-2025 2/2 house has been sold by his uncle to one Chhuni Ravidas. It has further been submitted that the recovery was made from the portion of Chhuni Ravidas. It has also been submitted that while making seizure, police has not complied Section 105 of the B.N.S.S. and the witnesses are also police personnel. It has also been submitted that the quantum of the contraband which has been recovered from the possession of this petitioner is though more than small quantity but is much less than commercial quantity. Petitioner is having no criminal antecedent and he is languishing in judicial custody since 12.09.2025.

5. Learned APP appearing for the State has vehemently opposed the application for bail.

6. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this Court is inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. The above named petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rs. ten thousand only) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Special Judge NDPS Act-I, Patna in connection with Bhagwanganj P.S. Case No. 160 of 2025.

(Ashok Kumar Pandey, J) lata/- U T