← Library
Patna High CourtCWJC/21094/2018disposed

Satyendra Kumar v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

2020-01-07The Chief Justice -,Mr. Justice Dr. Anil Kumar Upadhyay2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.21094 of 2018 ====================================================== Satyendra Kumar, Son of Shri Ramashish Singh, Presently Posted as Clerk Valdeo Sanskrit High School, Masaurhi, P.S.- Masaurhi, District- Patna. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State Of Bihar through the Principal Secretary, Human Resources Development Department, Bihar, Patna 2.

The Special Director, Secondary Education, Bihar, Patna. 3.

The Bihar Sanskrit Education Board, Patna through its Secretary. 4.

The Secretary Bihar Sanskrit Education Board, Patna. 5.

The Chairman, Bihar Sanskrit Education Board, Patna. 6.

The District Education Office, Patna.

7.

The District Programme Office, Establishment Patna. 8.

The Secretary of the Managing Committee of Valdeo Sanskrit High School, Masaurhi, Patna.

... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Binod Kumar, Advocate For the Respondent/s :

Smt. Shilpa Singh -GA-12 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE and HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPADHYAY ORAL ORDER (Per: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE) 07-01-2020 The petition filed on 27.10.2018 is listed for hearing for the first time today before the Court.

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the respondents.

Petitioner has prayed in nut shell is as follows: "For quashing the notification dated 04.09.2013 by which it has been decided that the aid/grant of teaching and non-teaching staff of the school will be given without giving increment as well as full D.A."

Patna High Court CWJC No.21094 of 2018(2) dt.07-01-2020 2/2 After the matter was heard for some time, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner shall be content if a direction is issued to the concerned respondents to consider and decide the representation, which the petitioner shall be making afresh within a period of four weeks from today. Learned counsel for the State states that upon receipt of such request, if any, the same shall be dealt with in accordance with law, expeditiously and positively within a period of three months from the date of receipt thereof. Equally, liberty is reserved to the petitioner to take recourse to such alternative remedies as are otherwise available in accordance with law.

We are hopeful that as and when petitioner takes recourse to such remedies, as are otherwise available in law, before the appropriate forum, the same shall be dealt with, in accordance with law and with reasonable dispatch. The petition stands disposed of in the aforesaid terms. (Sanjay Karol, CJ) ( Anil Kumar Upadhyay, J) uday/- U