Bihar Motor Transport Federation v. The Union Of India
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.4383 of 2024 In Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.10229 of 2024 ====================================================== Bihar Motor Transport Federation Through Its Organiser Rabi Bhushan Sharma Aged about 51 years, S/O Bibhishan Sharma, At Purushottampur, P.S - Maniyari, District - Muzzafarpur ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
1.
The Union of India through its Secretary namely Pankaj Jain, Ministry of Petroleum and Natural Gas Department 2.
The State of Bihar through Principal Secretary namely Sanjay Kumar Agarwal, Transport dept, Govt. of Bihar, Patna At-Vishweshraiya Bhawan, Nehru Path, Patna 3.
Jaideo Ojha-General Manager, Bihar State Office (B.S.O.), Indian Oil Corporation Ltd., Bottalling Plant (B.P.), I.O.C. L. Bhawan Patliputra, Industrial Area, Patna 4.
Jyoti Prakash Chakravanti, Dy General Manager, Bihar State Office (B.S.O.), I.O.C.L., B.P. Patliputra, Industrial Area, Patna 5.
Jyoti Pakash Chakravarti, Transport Manager, Indian Oil Corporation, Sherpur, Muzaffarpur At present I.O.C.L., B.P. Patliputra Industrial Area, Patna ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Mukesh Kumar Singh, Adv.
For UOI :
Mr. Ram Tujabh Singh, Cgc.
:
Mr. Radhika Raman, Adv.
For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr. Madhaw Pd. Yadav, Government Pleader 23 :
Ms. Meera Singh, AC to GP23 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A. ABHISHEK REDDY ORAL ORDER 09-01-2026 This Court vide order dated 19.08.2024 has disposed of the CWJC No. 10299 of 2024 filed by the petitioner herein directing him to file a suitable representation before the authority and the same was directed to be considered and necessary orders passed.
2. Pursuant to the said order, the petitioner has
Patna High Court MJC No.4383 of 2024(6) dt.09-01-2026 2/2 submitted his representation and the same has been considered and necessary order dated 20.12.2024 passed vide (AnnexureP/5) filed along with supplementary show cause.
3. Having regard to the same, the present writ petition is closed leaving it open to the petitioner to challenge the order dated 20.12.2024, if not already challenged and if he is so advised.
4. Having regard to the same, the present MJC is closed.
(A. Abhishek Reddy, J) Ayush/- U