Ramakant Sah @ Rama Kant Sah @ Ramakant Shah v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.79514 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-110 Year-2017 Thana- KATEYA District- Gopalganj ====================================================== RAMAKANT SAH @ RAMA KANT SAH @ RAMAKANT SHAH Son of Hiraman Sah Resident of Village - Baraitha, P.O.- Ahiapur, P.S.- Vijayeepur, District- Gopalganj ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Bindhyachal Rai For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Nirmal Kumar Sinha ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S. KUMAR ORAL ORDER 22-01-2020 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State.

The petitioner apprehends his arrest in a case registered for the offence punishable under Section 409 of the Indian Penal Code.

Allegation against the petitioner is to have deliberately delayed in making available the Megha Suchi to the concerned authority.

It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that he is innocent and has falsely been implicated in this case. Similarly placed co-accused Devendra Mishra has already been granted bail by a co-ordinate Bench of this Court vide order dated 25.11.2019 passed in Cr. Misc. No.74979 of 2019. Petitioner has no criminal antecedent.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.79514 of 2019(2) dt.22-01-2020 2/2 Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, let the petitioner named above be released on bail, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the court below within a period of four weeks from today, on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 20,000/- with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned court below where the case is pending in connection with Kateya P.S. Case No.110 of 2017 subject to the condition as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C with following conditions:-

(1) Bailors should be local having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the court concerned.

(2) Petitioner shall co-operate in the trial and shall be present on each and every date fixed by the court and his absence on two consecutive dates without proper and reasonable reason will be sufficient to cancel his bail bond.

(3) If the petitioner tampers with the evidence or the witnesses of the case, in that case, prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail of the petitioner. (S. Kumar, J) Sanjay/- U T