Brijkishor Kumar @ Chhotu @ Brijkishor @ Chhotu Kumar v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.89390 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-65 Year-2024 Thana- KUDRA District- Kaimur (Bhabua) ====================================================== Brijkishor Kumar @ Chhotu @ Brijkishor @ Chhotu Kumar Son of Gupteshwar Sharma Resident of Village- Neraras, P.O. and P.S.- Kudra, Distt.- Kaimur at Bhabhua ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Kiran Kumari Sharma For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr. Renu Kumari ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 23-01-2025
1. Heard learned Counsel for the petitioner and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.
2. This application, for grant of anticipatory bail, arises out of Kudra Police Station Case No. 65 of 2024, disclosing offences under Sections 448, 307 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 27 of the Arms Act.
3. As per the FIR, on 18.02.2024, at around 4:15 pm in the evening, informant was at her home (in-laws' house) when suddenly her brother Brij Kishore Kumar came to her inlaws house and asked to call her daughter. At that time, informant was shocked and saw that her brother was hiding something. Suddenly, informant's brother took out his weapon and shot the informant with an intention to kill. When the
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.89390 of 2024(2) dt.23-01-2025 2/2 informant screamed, her brother ran away.
4. Learned Counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has not committed any offence in the manner alleged and has falsely been implicated in the present case due to high handedness of the police officials. Petitioner never went to informant's house. Occurrence took place in day light and if the petitioner had gone to the informant's house, he would have got caught by her family members. Injury caused to the informant is not on the vital part.
5. Having regard to the submissions made on behalf of the parties and taking into consideration the fact that there is specific allegation of firing upon the petitioner, I am not inclined to grant the petitioner privilege of anticipatory bail.
6. This application is, accordingly, rejected. (Anil Kumar Sinha, J) HarshPandey/- U T