Md. Majlum v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.83123 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-39 Year-2019 Thana- HAYAGHAT District- Darbhanga ====================================================== 1.

Md. Majlum, Son of Late Md. Abbas, Resident of Village - Rasulpur, P.S. - Hayaghat, District - Darbhanga (Bihar).

2.

Md. Guddu Son of Md. Majlum Resident of Village - Rasulpur, P.S. - Hayaghat, District - Darbhanga (Bihar).

3.

Md. Pintu, Son of Md. Majlum, Resident of Village - Rasulpur, P.S. - Hayaghat, District - Darbhanga (Bihar).

4.

Md. Pyare @ Ariya, Son of Md. Irfan, Resident of Village - Rasulpur, P.S. - Hayaghat, District - Darbhanga (Bihar).

5.

Md. Ahashan @ Md. Ahasn, Son of Nasruddin, Resident of Village - Rasulpur, P.S. - Hayaghat, District - Darbhanga (Bihar). 6.

Md. Rabban, Son of Nasruddin, Resident of Village - Rasulpur, P.S. - Hayaghat, District - Darbhanga (Bihar).

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Vinay Kumar Mishra For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Ashok Kumar ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 21-01-2020 This is an application for grant of anticipatory bail in connection with Hayaghat P. S. Case No. 39 of 2019 disclosing offences under Sections 447, 448, 341, 323, 354, 379, 307, 506, 504/34 of IPC.

As per F.I.R. so far petitioners no.1,2 and 6 are concerned, there is specific allegation of assault by Sword, Farsa on the head of the informant and there are general allegation so far other petitioners are concerned. Submission of the learned counsel for the petitioners

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.83123 of 2019(2) dt.21-01-2020 2/2 is that the injury report does not support any injury caused by sword and farsa. Moreover, no specific allegation has been attributed against the petitioners no. 3 to 5. Heard learned A.P.P. also, who has opposed the prayer for anticipatory bail.

Having heard both sides, considering the above submissions, so far petitioners no. 1, 2 and 6 are concerned, I am not inclined to grant privilege of anticipatory bail to them. They have to surrender and pray for regular bail. So far other petitioners are concerned, let they, in the event of their arrest or surrender before the court below within six weeks, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount to the satisfaction of learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, IX, Darbhanga, in connection with Hayaghat P. S. Case No. 39 of 2019. with the aforesaid, this application is disposed of. (Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) Sunil Shukla/- U T