Rahul Sah @ Rahul Kumar Sah v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.85224 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-381 Year-2025 Thana- MAHARAJGANJ District- Siwan ====================================================== Rahul Sah @ Rahul Kumar Sah Son of Shailesh Sah Resident of VillageMahuwari, P.S.- Maharajganju, Distt.- Siwan. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar. ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Ms. Kumari Anupam, Advocate.

For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Mritunjay Kumar Nirala, A.P.P.

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL DUTTA MISHRA ORAL ORDER 06-01-2026

1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State.

2. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in connection with Maharajganj P.S. Case No.381 of 2025 instituted under Section 309(4) of the B.N.S., 2023.

3. As per the prosecution case, when the informant was going to Maharajganj by his motorcycle, four accused persons including the petitioner riding on two motorcycles came and snatched the informant's motorcycle and when the informant opposed, they put pistol on him and robbed his motorcycle. Subsequent to the information to the police, the police arrived at the place of occurrence and chased the accused persons, consequently, the accused persons fled away leaving behind the motorcycle of the informant.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner is innocent and has been falsely implicated in this case

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.85224 of 2025(2) dt.06-01-2026 2/2 with ulterior motive. He further submits that neither the petitioner was not present on the spot nor any incriminating material has been recovered from the conscious possession of petitioner. Learned counsel submits that except the suspicion made by the unknown co-villager, there is no material against the petitioner. He further submits that petitioner has one criminal antecedent and he undertakes to cooperate in the investigation and trial of the case.

5. Learned A.P.P. for the State opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail.

6. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and submissions of learned counsel for the parties, in the event of arrest or surrender before the Court below within six weeks from today, the petitioner be released on bail upon furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount to each to the satisfaction of the learned A.C.J.M.-II, Siwan in connection with Maharajganj P.S. Case No.381 of 2025, subject to the conditions laid down in Section 482(2) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023. (Sunil Dutta Mishra, J) Ritik/- U T