Dharo @ Dharmendra Paswan @ Ghamendra Paswan v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.84915 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-220 Year-2022 Thana- MANPUR District- Nalanda ====================================================== Dharo @ Dharmendra Paswan @ Ghamendra Paswan S/o Kaushlendra Paswan Resident of Village- Paroha, P.S.- Manpur, District - Nalanda at Biharsharif ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Ashok Kumar Jha, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Sanjay Kumar Pandey, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR PANDEY ORAL ORDER 15-12-2025 Heard Mr. Ashok Kumar Jha, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. Sanjay Kumar Pandey, learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner has prayed for bail in connection with Manpur P.S. Case No. 220 of 2022 registered for the offence punishable under Section 394 of the Indian Penal Code.

3. As per the case of the prosecution, unknown persons on pistol point snatched the mobile phones and the Glamour Motorcycle of the informant and fled away.

4. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner has submitted that petitioner is innocent and has committed no offence. He has been falsely implicated in this case. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the FIR was lodged against unknown miscreants. During the course of investigation, one

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.84915 of 2025(2) dt.15-12-2025 2/2 Gautam Kumar has given his confessional statement in which he has named this petitioner. He also submits that the said bike was recovered from Gautam Kumar and it has already been released in favor of the informant. He further submits that Gautam Kumar has been granted bail by learned coordinate Bench of this Court in Cr. Misc. No. 10386 of 2023. The case of this petitioner stands on better footing. Moreover, petitioner is languishing in judicial custody since 27.08.2025.

5. The application for bail is opposed by learned APP for the State and submits that the petitioner is having criminal antecedent of one case.

6. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this Court is inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. The above named petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rs. ten thousand only) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate-II, Nalanda at Bihar Sharif in connection with Manpur P.S. Case No. 220 of 2022. (Ashok Kumar Pandey, J) Sudhanshu/- U T