Uday Ray @ Uday Narayan Ray v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.87960 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-65 Year-2024 Thana- Bahoranpur District- Bhojpur ====================================================== Uday Ray @ Uday Narayan Ray Son of Radhakishun Ray Resident of Village - Sarangpur, P.S. - Bohoranpur, District - Bhojpur ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Kamlesh Prasad Yadav, Adv.

For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Manoj Kumar, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR PANDEY ORAL ORDER 10-01-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. Manoj Kumar, learned APP for the State.

2. The instant application for anticipatory bail has been filed by the petitioner apprehending his arrest in connection with Bahoranpur P.S. Case No. 65 of 2024 instituted for the offence under Sections 80/3(5) of the BNS Act.

3. The case of the prosecution is that the daughter of the informant namely Rinku Devi was married to Madhu Rai (son of the petitioner). It is also alleged that there was demand of dowry and that on account of non fulfillment of dowry demand, the daughter of the informant was administered poison due to which she died.

4. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner has submitted that petitioner is innocent and has committed no offence. He has falsely been implicated in this case. It is also submitted that Annexure-2 is a copy of a petition

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.87960 of 2024(2) dt.10-01-2025 2/2 which has been filed by the informant before the trial court in which the informant has submitted that there was no demand of dowry and that the case was filed due to confusion. Informant has also submitted that the petitioner along with others are innocent. Petitioner is father in law and the main thrust is against husband.

5. In contra, learned APP appearing for the State opposes the prayer of bail of the petitioner.

6. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and in the facts and circumstances of the case as stated above, this Court is inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. The petitioner is directed to surrender in the Court below within a period of four weeks from today and in the event of his arrest or surrender in connection with Bahoranpur P.S. Case No. 65 of 2024, he will be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned A.C.J.M.-7 Bhojpur, Ara subject to the conditions as laid down under section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C. (Ashok Kumar Pandey, J) Sudhanshu/- U T