Gaurav Kumar @ Sonu v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.83865 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-629 Year-2025 Thana- HAJIPUR SADAR District- Vaishali ====================================================== Gaurav Kumar @ Sonu Son of Ravindra Singh @ Devendra Singh Resident Of Village- Nayatola Dighi Purvi, Ps- Hajipur Sadar, Dist- Vaishali At Hajipur ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Rajiv Ranjan, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Madhura Nand Jha, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR PANDEY ORAL ORDER 11-12-2025 Heard Mr. Rajiv Ranjan, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. Madhura Nand Jha, learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner has prayed for bail in connection with Hajipur Sadar P.S. Case No. 629 of 2025 registered for the offence punishable under Sections 318(4), 308(5), 309(4), 317(2), 3(5) of the B.N.S., 2023 corresponding to Section 420, 386, 392, 411, 34 of the Indian Penal Code and Sections 25(1-B)a, 26, 35 of the Arms Act.

3. The case of the prosecution in short is that the petitioner has snatched a mobile.

4. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner has submitted that petitioner is innocent and has committed no offence. He has been falsely implicated in this case. Learned counsel for the petitioner also submits that a mobile was

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.83865 of 2025(2) dt.11-12-2025 2/2 recovered from the possession of this petitioner and that the IMEI number of the recovered mobile does not match with the mobile in question. It has also been submitted that the mobile, which has been recovered from the possession of this petitioner, belongs to his mother. He further submits that the witnesses of the seizure list are police personnel. Moreover, the petitioner is languishing in judicial custody since 08.09.2025.

5. The application for bail is opposed by learned APP for the State and submits that the petitioner is having criminal antecedent of one case.

6. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this Court is inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. The above named petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rs. ten thousand only) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Vaishali at Hajipur in connection with Hajipur Sadar P.S. Case No. 629 of 2025.

(Ashok Kumar Pandey, J) Sudhanshu/- U T