← Library
Patna High CourtCWJC/760/2019dismissed

Amrita Kumari, v. The State Of Bihar

2022-09-13Mr. Justice Madhuresh Prasad2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.760 of 2019 ====================================================== Amrita Kumari, Daughter of Sri Siya Ram Pandit, Resident of VillageKarnkueya, P.O.- Dhekahan Bazar, P.S. Motihari Muffasil, District- East Champaran.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar 2.

The Principal Secretary, Social Welfare Department, Government of Bihar, New Secretariat, Patna.

3.

The Director, Social Welfare Department-cum-Vice-Chairman, State Child Protection Committee, Government of Bihar, New Secretariat, Patna. 4.

The Collector-cum-District Magistrate, East Champaran at Motihari. 5.

The District Social Welfare Officer, East Champaran at Motihari. 6.

The Assistant Director, District Child Protection Unit, East Champaran at Motihari.

7.

The Chairman, State Child Protection Committee, 2nd Floor, Aapnaghar (Behind Lalit Bhawan), Baily Road, Patna.

8.

The Deputy Development Commissioner, East Champaran at Motihari. ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Umeshanand Pandit For the Respondent/s :

Mr. Rajesh Kumar, AC to GP-3 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MADHURESH PRASAD ORAL ORDER 13-09-2022 The petitioner's contractual engagement as a community worker was brought to an end by the impugned order, which is dated 06.12.2016. The same is sought to be impugned by filing the writ petition in November 2018, two years thereafter.

The Court would find that the engagement was contractual and from the impugned order, it is obvious that the period of contract lapsed on 14.11.2015, whereafter no further

Patna High Court CWJC No.760 of 2019(3) dt.13-09-2022 2/2 contract was executed between the petitioner and the respondents. The Court, therefore, does not find any reason to interfere with the impugned order as the writ petition suffers from vice of delay and laches.

Further it is apparent from Annexure-8 that under order dated 04.04.2018, the petitioner was again selected for being engaged on contractual basis as social worker. The admitted position is that she has not submitted joining pursuant to the said selection.

The writ petition, in the circumstances, is devoid of merits and the same is dismissed.

(Madhuresh Prasad, J) SUMIT/- U