Patna High CourtCR. MISC./86139/2023allowed

Navin Kumar Jha@Naveen Kumar Jha v. The State Of Bihar

2024-01-11Mr. Justice Sunil Kumar Panwar2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.86139 of 2023 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-453 Year-2023 Thana- RUNISAIDPUR District- Sitamarhi ====================================================== Navin Kumar Jha@Naveen Kumar Jha S/O Late Baccha Jha R/O VillPremnagar, Ps-Garha(Runnisaidpur), Dist-Sitamarhi. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Ashok Kumar Jha For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Uday Chand Prasad ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL KUMAR PANWAR ORAL ORDER 11-01-2024 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, informant and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner has prayed for regular bail in a case instituted for the offence under Sections 302 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 27 of the Arms Act.

3. As per prosecution case, It is alleged that the petitioner along with others is of killing the husband of the informant.

4. It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that petitioner has been falsely implicated in this case due to dirty village politics. He has committed no offence. There is general and omnibus allegation against the petitioner rather the specific allegation against co-accused Ankit Jha, who shot fired upon the deceased, due to which he died. There is no specific

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.86139 of 2023(2) dt.11-01-2024 2/2 overt act against the petitioner. Petitioner has got no criminal antecedent as stated in para-3 of the bail petition. He is languishing in judicial custody since 09.09.2023.

5. The application for bail is opposed by learned APP for the State and learned counsel for the informant.

6. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and considering the facts and circumstances of the case as well as period of custody, this court is inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. The above named petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rs. ten thousand only) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Court concerned in connection with Runisaidpur P.S. Case No. 453 of 2023.

(Sunil Kumar Panwar, J) Arish/- U T