← Library
Patna High CourtCWJC/508/2024dismissed

Rakesh Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

2024-02-22Mr. Justice Mohit Kumar Shah2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.508 of 2024 ====================================================== Rakesh Kumar Son of Avadhesh Kumar Singh, Resident of VillageSingarahiya, Police Station- Sahiyara, District- Sitamarhi. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar through the Chief Secretary, Govt. of Bihar, Patna. 2.

The Additional Chief Secretary, Department of Cooperation, Vikash Bhawan, New Secretariat, Patna.

3.

The Registrar, Co-operative Societies, Bihar, Patna. 4.

The Joint Registrar, Co-operative Society, Tirhut Division, Muzaffarpur. 5.

The District Central Cooperative Bank, Sitamarhi through its Managing Director, Sitamarhi.

6.

The Managing Director, the Sitamarhi, District- Central Cooperative Bank Ltd. Dumara, Sitamarhi.

... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Jay Prakash Singh, Advocate For the Respondent/s :

Mr.Government Advocate 9 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MOHIT KUMAR SHAH ORAL ORDER 22-02-2024

1. The present writ petition has been filed seeking the following relief(s):- "1. That this is an application for issuance of a writ in the nature of mandamus commanding and directing the respondent no. 5 and 6 to reinstate the petitioner in the service with all consequential benefits attached to the post as the petitioner has been removed without adhering the principle of natural Justice and fair play and and/or for issuance of such other order or direction

Patna High Court CWJC No.508 of 2024(2) dt.22-02-2024 2/2 for which the petitioners may be found legally entitled to in the facts and circumstances of the case as stated hereinunder."

2. At the outset, the learned counsel for the petitioner seeks not to press the present writ petition, however, seeks liberty on behalf of the petitioner to avail such other alternative remedies as are otherwise available under the law, for redressal of his aforesaid grievances. Liberty so sought is granted.

3. The writ petition stands dismissed as not pressed. (Mohit Kumar Shah, J) Saurav/- U