Pintu Kumar v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.86055 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-574 Year-2025 Thana- MAKHDUMPUR District- Jehanabad ====================================================== Pintu Kumar S/o Tutu Kumar @ Vijay Kumar R/o Vill- Ladauya, P.S.- Makhdumpur, Distt- Jehanabad ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner :
Mr. Anil Kumar, Advocate Mr. Shamir Mehra, Advocate For the State :
Mr. Umeshanand Pandit, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 07-01-2026 Heard Mr. Anil Kumar, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner and Mr. Umeshanand Pandit, learned APP appearing on behalf of the State.
2. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in a case registered for the offence punishable under Section 64 of the B.N.S..
3. The prosecution case, in brief, is that on 19.07.2025 at about 12 o'clock, when the informant was sleeping in her rented house, in the meantime, this petitioner entered the house, forcibly undressed her and established physical relations with her.
4. It is submitted by learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner that petitioner is quite innocent and has
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.86055 of 2025(2) dt.07-01-2026 2/3 committed no offence. As a matter of fact, in the morning of the alleged date of occurrence, husband of informant slapped the younger brother of this petitioner on which he protested and threatened the husband of informant not to repeat the same in future and in retaliation, this false and concocted case has been lodged. During investigation, the victim in her statement recorded under Section 183 of the B.N.S.S. has categorically stated that nothing has been done with her and she has lodged the present case only on the pressure of her husband. Petitioner claims clean antecedents.
5. Learned A.P.P. for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner.
6. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, statement of the victim recorded under Section 183 of the B.N.S.S. and clean antecedents of the petitioner, the prayer for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner is allowed.
7. Accordingly, in the event of arrest/surrender within a period of eight weeks from today, let the above named petitioner be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail-bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Additional Chief Judicial
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.86055 of 2025(2) dt.07-01-2026 3/3 Magistrate-I, Jehanabad in connection with Makhdumpur P.S. Case No. 574 of 2025, subject to condition as laid down under Section 482(2) of the B.N.S.S..
(Prabhat Kumar Singh, J) shashank/- U T