Md. Najir v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No. 83870 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-187 Year-2025 Thana- SARSI District- Purnia ====================================================== Md. Najir Son of Amit Akhtar Resident of Village - Budhiya Rahmatpur, P.S. - Sarsi, District - Purnea.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Ajit Kumar Singh, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mrs. Veena Kumari Jaiswal, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR PANDEY ORAL ORDER 11-12-2025 Heard Mr. Ajit Kumar Singh, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mrs. Veena Kumari Jaiswal, learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner has prayed for bail in connection with Sarsi P.S. Case No. 187 of 2025 registered for the offence punishable under Sections 8(c) and 21(b) of the N.D.P.S. Act.

3. The case of the prosecution in short is that from the possession of this petitioner, altogether 12.016 gram of brown sugar was recovered.

4. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner has submitted that petitioner is innocent and has committed no offence. He has been falsely implicated in this case. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that nothing has been recovered from the possession of this petitioner. The

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No. 83870 of 2025(2) dt.11-12-2025 2/2 witnesses of seizure are police personnel. It has also been submitted that the contraband which has been recovered from the possession of this petitioner is though more than small quantity but is much less than commercial quantity. He further submits that a statement has been made in para 3 of the petition that petitioner has no criminal antecedent and he is languishing in judicial custody since 04.10.2025.

5. The application for bail is opposed by learned APP for the State.

6. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this Court is inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. The above named petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rs. ten thousand only) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Special Judge, NDPS Act, Purena in connection with Sarsi P.S. Case No. 187 of 2025.

(Ashok Kumar Pandey, J) Sudhanshu/- U T