Hareram v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.85726 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-101 Year-2025 Thana- Cyber P.S. District- Nalanda ====================================================== Hareram Son of Vinay Singh R/o - Ghosrawan, P.S - Pawapuri, District - Nalanda.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Sanjeev Kumar Mishra, Advocate Mr. Shubham Kumar Upadhyay, Advocate Mr. Adya Pandey, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Shaheen Begum, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR PANDEY ORAL ORDER 19-02-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner has prayed for bail in connection with Nalanda Cyber P.S. Case No. 101 of 2025 registered for the offence punishable under Sections 318(4), 319(2), 336(3), 3(5) of the B.N.S., 2023 and Section 66(D) of the I.T. Act.

3. The case of the prosecution, in short, is that the police had input that certain persons are indulged in cyber fraud. On this input, they have raided the place. Certain persons managed to flee away, whereas the petitioner was apprehended. Three bikes and a mobile phone were recovered. It is also alleged two complaints are registered against the mobile number of the petitioner. Upon being question, the petitioner

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.85726 of 2025(3) dt.19-02-2026 2/3 allegedly stated that he, along with his associates, used to cheat the common person on the pretext of providing loans and offering discounts on delivery. The house of the petitioner was also searched; however, no incriminating article was recovered.

4. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner has submitted that petitioner is innocent and has committed no offence. He has been falsely implicated in this case. He also submits that save and except a mobile phone, nothing has been recovered from the possession of the petitioner. No incriminating article to suggest the commission of cyber fraud by this petitioner was recovered. He further submits that a statement has been made in para 3 of the petition that petitioner has no criminal antecedent and he is languishing in judicial custody since 26.09.2025.

5. The application for bail is opposed by learned APP for the State.

6. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this Court is inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. The above named petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rs. ten thousand only) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Chief

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.85726 of 2025(3) dt.19-02-2026 3/3 Judicial Magistrate, Nalanda at Biharsharif in connection with Nalanda Cyber P.S. Case No. 101 of 2025.

(Ashok Kumar Pandey, J) Sudhanshu/- U T