Pramod Singh v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.88848 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-61 Year-2024 Thana- SHIKARGANJ District- East Champaran ====================================================== 1.
Pramod Singh, Son of Brijnath Singh, Resident of Village- Kapoorpakri, P.S.- Shikarganj, District- East Champaran, Bihar, Pin- 845418 2.
Subodh Singh, Son of Brijnath Singh, Resident of Village- Kapoorpakri, P.S.- Shikarganj, District- East Champaran, Bihar, Pin- 845418 3.
Chotu Singh @ Amod Singh, Son of Brijnath Singh, Resident of VillageKapoorpakri, P.S.- Shikarganj, District- East Champaran, Bihar, Pin- 845418 4.
Gomod Singh @ Gomod Kumar Singh, Son of Brijnath Singh, Resident of Village- Kapoorpakri, P.S.- Shikarganj, District- East Champaran, Bihar, Pin- 845418 ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Abhinav Alok, Advocate Mr. Kautilya Kumar Prasad, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :
Mrs. Sucheta Yadav, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL DUTTA MISHRA ORAL ORDER 08-01-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned APP for the State.
2. The petitioners apprehend their arrest in connection with Sikarganj P.S. Case No. 61 of 2024 for the offence registered under Sections 30 (a) and 45 of the Bihar Prohibition & Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022.
3. As per the prosecution case, there is recovery of 5.295 litre of English liquor from the house of one Raj Kumar Singh and the allegation against the petitioners is that they fled away from the spot on seeing the police.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.88848 of 2024(2) dt.08-01-2025 2/2 petitioners are innocent and have been falsely implicated in this case due to village politics. He further submits that petitioners were not present on the spot at the time of occurrence. Nothing has been recovered from the conscious possession of the petitioners. Petitioners have no concern with the house from where the liquor has been seized. Petitioners have no criminal antecedent and they undertake to cooperate in the investigation of this case.
5. Learned APP for the State has opposed the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioners.
6. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and submissions of learned counsel for the parties, let the petitioners, above named, in the event of their arrest or surrender before the Court below within a period of thirty days from the date of receipt of the order, be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (rupees ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the concerned Court where the case is pending in connection with Sikarganj P.S. Case No. 61 of 2024, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 482 (2) of the B.N.S.S. (Sunil Dutta Mishra, J) khushbu/- U T