Raju Sahani @ Raju Kumar Sahni v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.78411 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-302 Year-2019 Thana- BASOPATTI District- Madhubani ====================================================== RAJU SAHANI @ RAJU KUMAR SAHNI S/o Devendra Sahni Resident of Village- Madhiya Tol Kamalabari, Police Station- Basopatti DistrictMadhubani. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar.

... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Sanjay Kumar For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Anil Prasad Singh ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S. KUMAR ORAL ORDER 02-12-2019 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State.

Petitioner, who is in custody, seeks bail in connection with Basopatti P.S. Case No. 302 of 2019 registered for the offence punishable under Sections 272, 273, 414 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 30(a) of Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016.

Allegation is recovery of 90 litres of Nepali Saufi from the motorcycle which was being ridden by the petitioner. It has been submitted on behalf of petitioner that nothing was recovered from his possession and he has been falsely implicated in this case. Petitioner has no criminal antecedent and is in custody since 19.11.2019.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.78411 of 2019(2) dt.02-12-2019 2/2 Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, let the petitioner named above be released on bail upon furnishing bail bond of Rs. 20,000/- (twenty thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned court below, in connection with Basopatti P.S. Case No. 302 of 2019 subject to the conditions that:-

(1) Bailors should be local having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the court concerned.

(2) Petitioner shall co-operate in the trial and shall be properly represented on each and every date fixed by the court and his absence on two consecutive dates without proper and sufficient reason the trial court will be at liberty to cancel his bail bond.

(3) If the petitioner tampers with the evidence or the witnesses of the case, in that case, prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail of the petitioner.

(S. Kumar, J) veena/- U T