Angad Chaudhary v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.78859 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-162 Year-2019 Thana- DHANSOI District- Buxar ====================================================== Angad Chaudhary S/o Sugriv Choudhary, R/o village- Karaila, P.S.- Dhansoi, District- Buxar.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar.

... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Akhilesh Kumar Pandey For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Kumar Ranjit Ranjan ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SHIVAJI PANDEY ORAL ORDER 11-12-2019 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.

In this case, the petitioner is seeking regular bail in connection with CIS-Excise-1131/2019, Excise Gr.969/2019, arising from Dhansoi P.S. Case No.162 of 2019 registered for offence punishable under section 30 (A) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act.

Recovery has been made of 85.860 litres of illegal liquor and thereafter when the petitioner could not know that his name has also been added in the name of accused, he surrendered before the court below.

Looking to the facts and circumstances of the case, the prayer for bail of the petitioner is allowed and he is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/-

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.78859 of 2019(3) dt.11-12-2019 2/2 with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of 2nd A.D.J.-cum-Special Judge (Excise), Buxar in connection with CIS-Excise-1131/2019, Excise Gr.969/2019, arising from Dhansoi P.S. Case No.162 of 2019, subject to the condition that one of the bailors of the petitioner shall be a local person having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the concerned Court. The petitioner will not induce any witness or tamper with the evidence. The petitioner shall cooperate in the disposal of trial and make himself available as and when required by the court. If the petitioner is found involved in similar type of allegation in future, the prosecution will have liberty to file an application for cancellation of his bail bond. (Shivaji Pandey, J) Mahesh/- U T