Narendra Kumar Verma v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.87249 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-305 Year-2024 Thana- KHAJEKALA District- Patna ====================================================== Narendra Kumar Verma S/O Md. Hiira R/O Mohalla- Mogalpura, Gurhatta, Chhoti Bazar, Behind Kotgasi Chowki, P.S- Khajekalan, Distt.- Patna, PIN800008. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Y.C. Verma, Sr. Advocate Mr. Pramod Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Anil Kumar Singh No. 1, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJANI KUMAR SHARAN ORAL ORDER 19-12-2024 Heard learned counsels for the parties.

2.

The petitioner apprehends his arrest in connection with Khajekalan P.S. Case No.305 of 2024, registered for the offence punishable under Sections 126, 115(2), 118(1), 109, 351, 352/3(5) of the Bhartiya Nyay Sanhita.

3.

As per the FIR, petitioner and his wife abused the informant and also assaulted him on his head due to which he fell down.

4.

It is submitted by learned Senior Counsel for the petitioner that petitioner is quite innocent and has committed no offence. He has been falsely implicated in this case. No such occurrence, in the manner as alleged, has ever taken place. The allegation levelled against the petitioner is not specific rather

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.87249 of 2024(2) dt.19-12-2024 2/2 general and omnibus in nature. There is case and counter case between the parties. Both the parties are agnates and there is some dispute regarding property between the parties. It is further submitted that the wife of the petitioner has already been granted anticipatory bail by the learned Court below. The bail application of the petitioner was rejected on the ground that the injury was of grievous nature. Petitioner has no criminal antecedent.

5.

Learned APP for the State opposed the prayer for anticipatory bail by submitting that there is specific allegation against the petitioner to assault the informant due to which he sustained grievous injury.

6.

Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case as well as considering the nature of injury, I am not inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. The prayer for grant of anticipatory bail on his behalf is hereby rejected. 7.

Accordingly, this application is dismissed.

(Anjani Kumar Sharan, J) shikha/- U T