Md. Arshad v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No. 84161 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-276 Year-2025 Thana- DALSINGHSARAI District- Samastipur ====================================================== 1.
Md. Arshad S/O Md. Inamul Haque R/O Village- Kamrown, P.SDalsinghsarai, Distt.- Samastipur. 2.
Md. Harish S/O Md. Inamul Haque R/O Village- Kamrown, P.SDalsinghsarai, Distt.- Samastipur. ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Lakshmindra Kumar Yadav, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr. Gulnar Begum, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR PANDEY ORAL ORDER 15-12-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned APP for the State.
2. The petitioners have prayed for bail in connection with Dalsinghsarai P.S. Case No. 276 of 2025 registered for the offence punishable under Sections 305 and 331(4) of the B.N.S., 2023.
3. The case of the prosecution in short is that some unknown miscreants entered the house of the informant in the night and they took away the Motorcycle, mobile, cloths and Rs. 13,000/-.
4. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners has submitted that petitioners are innocent and have committed no offence. They have been falsely implicated in this case. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the FIR
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No. 84161 of 2025(2) dt.15-12-2025 2/2 was lodged against unknown miscreants. During the course of investigation, co-accused namely, Badal Kumar and Md. Ehshan have given their confessional statement in which the name of this petitioner has surfaced. It has also been submitted that nothing has been recovered from the possession of this petitioner. He further submits that the petitioners are languishing in judicial custody since 01.08.2025.
5. The application for bail is opposed by learned APP for the State and submits that petitioner no. 1 is having criminal antecedent of four cases whereas petitioner no. 2 is having criminal antecedent of three cases.
6. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this Court is inclined to enlarge the petitioners on bail. The above named petitioners are directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rs. ten thousand only) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Judicial Magistrate 1st Class, Dalsinghsarai in connection with Dalsinghsarai P.S. Case No. 276 of 2025.
(Ashok Kumar Pandey, J) Sudhanshu/- U T