← Library
Patna High CourtCR. WJC/1800/2019dismissed

Sunita Devi v. The State Of Bihar Through The Director General Of Police, Bihar, Patna

2020-02-04Mr. Justice Rajeev Ranjan Prasad2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Writ Jurisdiction Case No.1800 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-78 Year-2018 Thana- BHAGWAN BAZAR District- Saran ====================================================== Sunita Devi W/o Ajit Kumar Singh Resident of Village- Dhobaval, P.S.- Khaira, District- Saran ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State Of Bihar Through The Director General Of Police, Bihar, Patna Bihar 2.

The Superintendent of Police, Saran Bihar 3.

The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Saran Bihar 4.

The Officer- in- Charge, Bhagwan Bazar, Police Station, Sadar Division, District- Saran Bihar 5.

Investigating Officer, Bhagwan Bazar Bihar 6.

Tarkeshwar Singh S/o Rajeshwar Singh Resident of Madhopur, P.S.- Jalalpur, District- Saran ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Praveen Kumar, Adv.

For the Respondent/s :

Mr.Ajay Kumar, AC to GP-4 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJEEV RANJAN PRASAD ORAL ORDER 04-02-2020 In the opinion of this Court, there is no reason for the petitioner to invoke the constitutional power of this Court under Article 226 of the Constitution of India in the facts of the present case. The writ application itself contains too many surmises and conjectures with regard to self-claimed apprehension of the petitioner that his son is being unnecessarily harassed in connection with this case.

Learned counsel for the State submits that presently the matter is under investigation and at this stage there is no

Patna High Court CR. WJC No.1800 of 2019(2) dt.04-02-2020 2/2 reason for the petitioner to understand that the investigation will not take place in right direction.

Considering the facts and circumstances of the case where the police is still investigating the matter and the petitioner has no reason and ground to demonstrate before this Court that the investigation is not taking place in right direction, this Court is not inclined to entertain this writ application. It is dismissed accordingly.

(Rajeev Ranjan Prasad, J) arvind/- U T