Patna High CourtCR. MISC./85407/2025bail rejected

Binod Das @ Vinod Das v. The State Of Bihar

2025-12-10Mr. Justice Prabhat Kumar Singh2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.85407 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-43 Year-2025 Thana- MOTIPUR District- Muzaffarpur ====================================================== Binod Das @ Vinod Das Son of Jai Narain Das @ jain Das R/o Village - Parsaunya, P.S. - Motipur, Distt. - Muzaffarpur. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner :

Mr. Upendra Kumar Chaubey, Advocate For the State :

Ms. Suman Kumari Singh, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 10-12-2025 Heard learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner and learned APP appearing on behalf of the State.

2. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in a case registered for the offence punishable under Sections 123 and 103(1) of the B.N.S..

3. As per prosecution case, on 31.01.2025, this petitioner took away son of informant and administered him poison as a result of which, during course of treatment, son of informant died.

4. It is submitted by learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner that petitioner is quite innocent and has committed no offence. Informant is not an eye witness to the occurrence and petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case merely on suspicion. At best, it is a case of last seen.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.85407 of 2025(2) dt.10-12-2025 2/2 Petitioner claims clean antecedents.

5. On the other hand, learned A.P.P. for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner and submitted that petitioner is named in the F.I.R. with specific accusation that he took away son of informant with him and administered poison due to which, son of informant died.

6. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, specific and direct nature of accusation and gravity of offence, the prayer for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner is rejected.

(Prabhat Kumar Singh, J) shashank/- U T