Ranjan Yadav @ Ranju Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.84223 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-77 Year-2025 Thana- NARPATGANJ District- Araria ====================================================== Ranjan Yadav @ Ranju Yadav Son of Nityanand Yadav Village- Thalha Madhaura Ward No 15, PS -Narpatganj Distt -Araria ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Madhav Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mrs. Meena Singh, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR PANDEY ORAL ORDER 15-12-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner has prayed for bail in connection with Narpatganj P.S. Case No. 77 of 2025 registered for the offence punishable under Sections 8, 20(b)(ii)(B) of the N.D.P.S. Act and Sections 25(1-B)(a), 26 of the Arms Act.

3. The case of the prosecution in short is that from the bag of this petitioner, 3 kg of Ganja and from his right pocket, one loaded country made pistol and a live cartridge was recovered.

4. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner has submitted that petitioner is innocent and has committed no offence. He has been falsely implicated in this case. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.84223 of 2025(2) dt.15-12-2025 2/2 nothing has been recovered from the possession of this petitioner. Police has not complied Section 105 of the BNSS while making seizure. It has also been submitted that the contraband which has been recovered from the possession of this petitioner is though more than small quantity but is much less than commercial quantity. Moreover, petitioner is languishing in judicial custody since 05.03.2025.

5. The application for bail is opposed by learned APP for the State and submits that the petitioner is having criminal antecedent of eleven cases.

6. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this Court is inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. The above named petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rs. ten thousand only) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Sessions Judge-cum-Special Judge, NDPS, Araria in connection with Narpatganj P.S. Case No. 77 of 2025.

(Ashok Kumar Pandey, J) Sudhanshu/- U T