Jabbar @ Jabba @ Md. Jabbar v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.84166 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-22 Year-2025 Thana- Marnga District- Purnia ====================================================== 1.

Jabbar @ Jabba @ Md. Jabbar, Son of Late Manir Nadaf, Resident of Village - Manganpatti, Morsanda, P.S.- Falka, District - Katihar. 2.

Md. Sattar @ Saddam @ Md. Saddam, Son of Rafique @ Rafo @ Rafique Nadaf, Resident of Village - Manganpatti, Morsanda, P.S.- Falka, District - Katihar.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Raj Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Umesh Lal Verma, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR PANDEY ORAL ORDER 19-02-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioners have prayed for bail in connection with Maranga P.S. Case No. 22 of 2025 registered for the offence punishable under Sections 310(4), 310(5) and 111 of B.N.S. and Sections 25(1-b)a, 26 and 37 of the Arms Act.

3. The case of the prosecution, in short, is that Suman Kumar Yadav, Md. Rahmat and Bijali Nadaf were apprehended on the information that they are planning to commit some offence and from their possession, arms were recovered.

4. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners has submitted that petitioners are innocent and have

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.84166 of 2025(2) dt.19-02-2026 2/2 committed no offence. They have been falsely implicated in this case. The apprehended persons were disclosed the name of these petitioners. Nothing has been recovered from their possession. They are languishing in judicial custody since 03.06.2025 and 29.08.2025 respectively. It has also been submitted that apprehended co-accused person has been granted bail by learned Co-ordinate Bench of this Court vide Cr. Misc. No. 47341 of 2025.

5. Learned APP for the State has vehemently opposed the application for bail and has submitted that petitioner no.1 is having criminal antecedent of three cases and petitioner no.2 is having criminal antecedent of four cases.

6. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this Court is inclined to enlarge the petitioners on bail. The above named petitioners are directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rs. ten thousand only) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned C.J.M., Purnea in connection with Maranga P.S. Case No.22 of 2025.

(Ashok Kumar Pandey, J) lata/- U T