← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./3100/2024dismissed

Mukesh Kumar @ Mukesh Kumar Mehta v. The State Of Bihar

2024-04-03Mr. Justice Sandeep Kumar2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.3100 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-498 Year-2022 Thana- FORBESGANJ District- Araria ====================================================== Mukesh Kumar @ Mukesh Kumar Mehta S/o Bijendra Mehta R/o Village - Kainjara, Ward no. 13, PS- Chhatapur (Rajeshwari (O.P), District- Supaul ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar Patna, ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Prafull Chandra Thakur For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Yogendra Kumar Singh ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP KUMAR ORAL ORDER 03-04-2024 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.

2. This is the second attempt of the petitioner for grant of bail. Earlier his application was rejected vide order dated 21.07.2023 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 39814/2023.

3. The following order was passed on 21.07.2023:- "Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing on behalf of the State.

2. The petitioner seeks regular bail in connection with Forbesganj P.S. Case No. 498 of 2022, registered for the offence punishable under Section 392 of the Indian Penal Code.

3. As per prosecution, one motorcycle and Rs. 9,00,000/- (Nine Lacs) has been looted. The name of the petitioner has come during investigation.

4. Since the petitioner has criminal antecedents of similar nature, I am not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner. Accordingly, his prayer for bail is rejected.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.3100 of 2024(4) dt.03-04-2024 2/2

5. The trial court is directed to expedite the trial of all the cases pending against the petitioner."

4. No ground for review of the earlier order is made out. It is accordingly dismissed.

5. The trial Court is directed to expedite the trial. (Sandeep Kumar, J) Saif/- U T