← Library
Patna High CourtCR. WJC/35/2025dismissed

Rakesh Kumar v. The State Of Bihar Through The Director General Of Police, Bihar

2025-06-30Mr. Justice Sandeep Kumar2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Writ Jurisdiction Case No.35 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-570 Year-2024 Thana- PATRAKARNAGAR District- Patna ====================================================== RAKESH KUMAR S/O CHANDRA DEO RAM R/O D-172, PC COLONY, P.S.-KANKARBAGH, AT AND DIST.- PATNA AT PRESENT R/AT 508, MAHVIR NAGAR, HANUMAN NAGAR, AT AND DIST.- PATNA-800020 ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar through the Director General of Police, Bihar PATNA 2.

The Inspector General of Police, Patna Range, Patna Bihar 3.

The District Magistrate, Patna Bihar 4.

The Senior Superintendent of Police, Patna Bihar 5.

The Station House Officer, Patrakar Nagar Police Station at and DistrictPatna Bihar 6.

Rishu Sharma son of Umesh Sharma Resident of near Manas Mandir, Hanuman Nagar (Vijay Nagar), Kankarbagh, P.S.- Patrakar Nagar at and District- Patna ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Bhola Kumar For the Respondent/s :

A.A.G.7 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP KUMAR ORAL ORDER 30-06-2025 Heard learned counsels for the parties.

2. The petitioner has approached this Court for the following reliefs:- (i) For issuance of writ, directing the Superintendent of Police, Patna to arrest the respondent no.6, who is the main accused in Patrakar Nagar P.S. Case No.570 of 2024, dated 07.10.2024, instituted for the offences under Sections 78, 352, 351(2), 79 of the BNS, 2023. (ii) For directing the Senior Superintendent of Police, Patna to provide protection of the life of the

Patna High Court CR. WJC No.35 of 2025(2) dt.30-06-2025 2/2 petitioner and his family and the victim daughter of the petitioner who is being threaten to kill by the respondent no.6.

(iii) For any other relief to which the petitioner is found entitled to in the facts and circumstances of the case.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw this application as it has become infructuous.

4. Permission is granted.

5. Accordingly, this application is dismissed as withdrawn.

(Sandeep Kumar, J) shikha/- U