Ganga Sagar Chaudhary v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.84004 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-235 Year-2025 Thana- DINARA District- Rohtas ====================================================== Ganga Sagar Chaudhary Son of Rajendra Chaudhary Resident of villageKailakh, PS- Dhansoin Distt- Buxar ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr.Arun Kumar Singh, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :
Ms.Nirmala Kumari, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH KUMAR VERMA ORAL ORDER 17-01-2026 Heard Mr.Arun Kumar Singh, learned counsel for the petitioner and Ms.Nirmala Kumari, learned A.P.P. for the State.
2. The petitioner seeks bail, who is in custody since 17.06.2025 in connection with Dinara P.S. Case No. 235 of 2025, F.I.R. dated 25.05.20285 registered for the offence punishable under Sections 103(1) and 3(5) of BNS, 2023.
3. According to prosecution case, informant alleges that on 24.05.2025 about 7.30 PM, the informant alongwith his relatives went for Tilak of his sister and after the Tilak ceremony, his brother was enticed by the accused and killed by sharp cutting weapon and using brick/stone.
4. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has clean antecedent. The allegation
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.84004 of 2025(3) dt.17-01-2026 2/3 as alleged in the FIR is false and fabricated and the petitioner has not committed any offence as alleged in the FIR. Petitioner has been made accused in the present case merely on the basis of suspicion, no one has seen the present occurrence, informant is not the eye witness of the alleged occurrence and nothing has come during investigation against the petitioner to suggest the involvement of the petitioner in the present occurrence. The police, after investigation, submitted chargesheet against the petitioner and the petitioner is in custody since 17.06.2025.
5. Learned APP for the State has opposed the prayer for bail of the petitioner and submits that the petitioner is named in the FIR and he has participated in the present crime in question but fairly submits that no one has seen the present occurrence and informant is not the eye witness of the alleged occurrence.
6. Considering the aforesaid facts, let the petitioner, above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Bikramganj, Rohtas in connection with Dinara P.S. Case No. 235 of 2025, with the following conditions:- (I) Petitioner shall co-operate in the trial and shall be
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.84004 of 2025(3) dt.17-01-2026 3/3 properly represented on each and every date fixed by the Court and shall remain physically present as directed by the Court and on his/her absence on two consecutive dates without sufficient reason, his/her bail bond shall be cancelled by the Court below. (II) If the petitioner tampers with the evidence or the witnesses, in that case, the prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail.
(III) And, further condition that the court below shall verify the criminal antecedent of the petitioner and in case at any stage, it is found that the petitioner has concealed his criminal antecedent, the court below shall take step for cancellation of bail bond of the petitioner. However, the acceptance of bail bonds in terms of the above-mentioned order shall not be delayed for purpose of or in the name of verification.
(Rajesh Kumar Verma, J) Nitesh/- U T