← Library
Patna High CourtMJC/4370/2024dismissed

Vinod Kumar Singh @ Jalim Singh v. The State Of Bihar Through K. Senthil Kumar

2025-05-09Mr. Justice Rajeev Ranjan Prasad2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.4370 of 2024 In Criminal Writ Jurisdiction Case No.1285 of 2023 ====================================================== Vinod Kumar Singh @ Jalim Singh Son of Late Nagina Singh, Resident of village - Chhitooni, Police Station - Police Station -Muriyari, District- Balia (U.P.).

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar through K. Senthil Kumar Son of not known, Home Secretary, Govt. of Bihar, Patna.

2.

Manesh Kumar Meena, Son of not known, the Inspector General (Prison), Govt. of Bihar, Patna.

3.

Mukul Kumar Gupta, Son of not known, the District Magistrate, Siwan. 4.

Saurabh Jorwal, Son of not known, the District Magistrate, East Champaran, Motihari.

5.

Amitesh Kumar, Son of not known, City Superintendent of Police, Siwan. 6.

Kantesh Kumar Mishra, Son of not known, the Superintendent of Police, East Champaran, Motihari.

7.

Manoj Kumar Singh, Son of not known, the Probation Officer, East Champaran, Motihari.

8.

Vidhu Kumar, Son of not known, the Jail Superintendent, Central Jail, Motihari.

9.

The Bihar State Sentence Remission Review Board through its Chairman, K. Senthil Kumar, Son of not known, Home Secretary, Govt. of Bihar. ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Ramakant Sharma, Sr. Advocate Mr.Rakesh Kumar Sharma, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Standing Counsel No.8 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJEEV RANJAN PRASAD ORAL ORDER 09-05-2025 This Court has been informed that the petitioner has already been released by the order of the State Sentence Remission Board in its meeting held on 29.01.2025.

Patna High Court MJC No.4370 of 2024(3) dt.09-05-2025 2/2

2. In the aforesaid view of the matter, learned senior counsel for the petitioner does not press this application.

3. This application is dismissed as not pressed. (Rajeev Ranjan Prasad, J) arvind/- U