← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./85778/2025bail granted

Sipil Singh @ Sipin Singh v. The State Of Bihar

2025-12-09Mr. Justice Prabhat Kumar Singh2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.85778 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-42 Year-2025 Thana- ADHAOURA District- Kaimur (Bhabua) ====================================================== 1.

Sipil Singh @ Sipin Singh Son of Late Jaiprakash Singh R/o Village - Chainpura, PS. - Adhaura, Dist. - Kaimur, Bhabhua. 2.

Vipil Singh @ Vipin Singh Son of Late Jaiprakash Singh R/o Village - Chainpura, PS. - Adhaura, Dist. - Kaimur, Bhabhua. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioners :

Mr. Aquaib Khan, Advocate For the State :

Mr. Nand Kumar, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 09-12-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned A.P.P. for the State.

2. The petitioners seek bail in a case registered for the offence punishable under Sections 103(1), 61(2), 238 and 3(5) of the B.N.S..

3. As per prosecution case, informant alleges that all the F.I.R. named accused persons, including these petitioners, with a view to grab the land of the deceased, who was issue less, killed his sister.

4. It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioners that petitioners are quite innocent and have committed no offence. From bare perusal of the F.I.R. it is apparent that

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.85778 of 2025(2) dt.09-12-2025 2/2 informant is not an eye witness to the occurrence. As a matter of fact, both parties are Gotiya and due to pre-existing land dispute between them, petitioners have falsely been implicated in this case. There is no other direct or indirect material on record to show the complicity of these petitioners in the alleged offence. Moreover, charge-sheet has already been submitted and petitioners, having no criminal antecedent, are in custody since 08.05.2025.

5. Learned A.P.P. for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer for grant of bail to the petitioners.

6. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, general and omnibus nature of accusation, period of custody and clean antecedents of the petitioners, the prayer for grant bail of to the petitioners is allowed.

7. Accordingly, let the above named petitioners be released on bail on furnishing bail-bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned C.J.M., Kaimur at Bhabhua in connection with Adhaura P.S. Case No. 42 of 2025.

(Prabhat Kumar Singh, J) shashank/- U T