← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./84229/2025allowed

Sanjay Ram @ Sanjay Das v. The State Of Bihar

2026-02-19Mr. Justice Ashok Kumar Pandey2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.84229 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-333 Year-2023 Thana- GARKHA District- Saran ====================================================== Sanjay Ram @ Sanjay Das S/O Munni Lal Ram R/O Village- Narayanpur, Police Station- Garkha, District- Saran.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Mani Shankar Mishra, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Nagendra Prasad, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR PANDEY ORAL ORDER 19-02-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner has prayed for bail in connection with Garkha P.S. Case No. 333 of 2023 registered for the offence punishable under Sections 341, 323, 324, 326, 504, 147, 148, 149 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 27 of the Arms Act.

3. The case of the prosecution, in short, is that the petitioner has thrown a bomb on the wall and the father of the informant got injured. It is further alleged that the petitioner has fired at the informant.

4. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner has submitted that petitioner is innocent and has committed no offence. He has been falsely implicated in this

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.84229 of 2025(4) dt.19-02-2026 2/2 case. From perusal of the injury report of the informant it will transpire that the informant has received two lacerated wound measuring 1/4" x 1/4"x 1/4" at lumber region. It has further been submitted that though the injuries are said to be caused by gunshot, the nature of injury is simple and the injuries are superficial one which is clear from the dimensions of the injury. Petitioner is having no criminal antecedent and he is languishing in judicial custody since 02.09.2025.

5. Learned APP appearing for the State has vehemently opposed the application for bail.

6. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this Court is inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. The above named petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rs. ten thousand only) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Judicial Magistrate 1st Class, Saran at Chapra in connection with Garkha P.S. Case No. 333 of 2023.

(Ashok Kumar Pandey, J) lata/- U T