Raveesh Kumar v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.85889 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-279 Year-2024 Thana- BACHHWARA District- Begusarai ====================================================== RAVEESH KUMAR Son of Ramanand Yadav R/O Village - Shivutola Ward No.- 13, P.S.- Bachhwara, District - Begusarai. ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Anil Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :
Md. Shakir Ahmad, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER 03-02-2026
1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State.
2. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 126(2), 115, 303(2), 109, 351(2), 352 and 3(5) of the BNS, 2023.
3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner is a person with clean antecedent and the informant alleges that accused persons came and Dropadi dashed her on the ground and assaulted with fist and slap, while Bitesh assaulted her husband by lathi causing injury on head and Sonu assaulted her mother-in-law by an iron rod causing injury on forehead and she lost her senses and petitioner took golden chain of her mother-in-law and gave to Amrita.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.85889 of 2025(2) dt.03-02-2026 2/3 petitioner has been falsely implicated in the instant case by the informant. It is next submitted that from perusal of the allegation as alleged in the FIR, it would manifest that petitioner is not alleged to have assaulted any of the injured rather is alleged to have snatched the chain of mother-in-law of the informant and given it to Amrita, but then the said allegation is an exaggerated allegation. It is further submitted that specific allegation of assaulting the mother-in-law of the informant is against Sonu who has already been granted the privilege of anticipatory bail by an order dated 22.03.2025 in Criminal Miscellaneous No. 77132 of 2024 by a learned Co-ordinate Bench. It is next submitted that petitioner is not a criminal.
5. Learned A.P.P. for the State opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner.
6. Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, the petitioner above-named, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the learned trial court within a period of six weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court where the case is pending/successor court in connection with Bachhwara P.S.
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.85889 of 2025(2) dt.03-02-2026 3/3 Case No. 279 of 2024 subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 482 (2) of BNSS.
7. Accordingly, the instant anticipatory bail application stands allowed.
(Satyavrat Verma, J) Rishabh/- U T