Patna High CourtCR. MISC./81967/2019dismissed

Prince Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

2020-02-26Mr. Justice Vinod Kumar Sinha2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.81967 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-107 Year-2019 Thana- MOUZAHIDPUR District- Bhagalpur ====================================================== PRINCE KUMAR Son of Munna Bhagat @ Munna Kumar Bhagat Resident of Mohalla- Ganga Vihar Colony, P.S.- Mojahidpur, District- Bhagalpur. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Ajit Kumar Singh For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Shailendra Kumar ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 26-02-2020 The petitioner seeks regular bail in connection with Mojahidpur (Babarganj) P.S. Case No. 107 of 2019, registered for offences punishable under Sections 307, 457, 326A/34 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 25(1-B) A, 26/36 of the Arms Act and subsequently Sections 341, 354, 380, 459 and 302 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 12 of POCSO Act was added.

Allegation against the petitioner and other accused persons is of throwing acid on the daughter of the informant causing serious injuries to her and while fleeing away accused persons left the pistol and other articles.

It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that during investigation, the materials have come that shows that petitioner has no hand in the occurrence and he was present

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.81967 of 2019(3) dt.26-02-2020 2/2 there in saving the girl but he has falsely been implicated in this case and he has been in judicial custody since 20.04.2019. Learned counsel for the State opposed the prayer for bail on the ground that the girl died due to injuries alleged to be caused by petitioner and whatever submission, petitioner has made that has come on later stage as at initial stage the witnesses have stated against the petitioner and before the death of the girl, her statement under Section 164 Cr.P.C. was also recorded, in which, she has stated about the involvement of the petitioner.

Having heard both sides, considering the serious nature of allegation, I am not inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail.

This application is accordingly dismissed.

(Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) sunilkumar/- U T