← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./76126/2018dismissed

Keshaw Tiwary v. The State Of Bihar

2019-01-29Mr. Justice Vinod Kumar Sinha2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.76126 of 2018 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-355 Year-2018 Thana- ARA NAWADA District- Bhojpur ====================================================== Keshaw Tiwary S/o late Ram Bachan Tiwary Resident of Village- Birona, P.S. Dinara, District- Rohtas, at Present residing at Mohalla- Krishnapuri Nagar Anaith, P.S. Ara Nawada, District- Bhojpur.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State Of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Amarendra Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Ashok Kumar Singh 1, A.P.P.

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 29-01-2019 Heard the parties.

The petitioner seeks anticipatory bail in connection with Ara Nawada P.S.Case No. 355 of 2018, registered for offences punishable under Sections 420, 406 and 504 of the Indian Penal Code.

Allegation as per F.I.R. against the petitioner is of taking money from the informant for admission of the son of the informant and after demanding the money by the informant, the petitioner assaulted him.

Submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that he has falsely been implicated in this case and the petitioner has got no concern with admission of the son of the informant in Prasad Medical College, Lucknow and he has no

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.76126 of 2018(3) dt.29-01-2019 2/2 criminal antecedent.

At the very outset learned counsel for the informant has informed that process under Section 82 Cr.P.C. has already been issued against the petitioner which appears from case diary.

Having heard both sides and in view of the facts and circumstances as discussed above, the case of the petitioner is concerned, I am not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner, Accordingly, prayer of anticipatory bail is rejected with a direction to the petitioner that if the petitioner surrender before the court below within a period of four weeks from the date of order and make prayer for regular bail, which will be considered by the learned court below on its own merit without being prejudiced by this order of this Court.

This application is accordingly dismissed.

(Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) sudha/- U T