Lalbabu Manjhi @ Lal Bahadur Manjhi v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.85365 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-39 Year-2019 Thana- SAHODARA District- West Champaran ====================================================== 1.
LALBAHADUR MANJHI @ LALBABU MANJHI Son of Late Nathuni Manjhi 2.
Sugriv Ram @ Sugriv Rai Son of Late Narayan Ram 3.
Rajendra Manjhi Son of Late Yugal Manjhi 4.
Satiman Mahto Son of Late Pahun Mahto All Residents of Village/Mohalla - Ban Bairiya, P.S.- Sahodara, Distt.- West Champaran.
5.
Nand Kishore Mahto Son of Chokat Mahto 6.
Jangli Mahto Son of Late Tulsi Mahto 7.
Ramlal Mahto Son of Ramjeevan Mahto 8.
Awadh Kishor Mahto Son of Ram Saran Mahto Petitioner Nos.5 to 8 Residents of Village - Dhamaura, P.S.- Sahodra, Distt.- West Champaran.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr.Pramod Kumar For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr.Uma Shankar Prasad Singh ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR JHA ORAL ORDER 28-08-2020 Heard both sides through Video Conferencing.
The petitioners apprehend their arrest in Sahodara P.S. Case No.39 of 2019 registered under Sections 147, 148, 149, 188, 189, 353, 504 and 506 of the Indian Penal Code. The informant (police officer) lodged the case alleging therein that lands of Khata No.63, Khata No.2 and Khata No.54 were declared surplus. The Amin went to the place of occurrence to carve out the lands but it is informed that the
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.85365 of 2019(3) dt.28-08-2020 2/2 Court has passed the order of status quo. While the Amin was measuring the land, the petitioners went there and tried to put some obstruction.
The learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners are innocent and they have in fact committed no offence. The petitioners were simply objected the Amin not to measure the land since there is an order of status quo passed by the Court.
Taking into consideration the facts aforesaid and nature of allegation made against the petitioners and the fact that no force was used, let the petitioners, above named, in the event of their arrest or surrender within a period of four weeks be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/-(Ten Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned C.J.M., West Champaran, Bettiah in connection with Sahodara P.S. Case No.39 of 2019, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure.
(Prabhat Kumar Jha, J) Saurabh/- U T