Patna High CourtCR. MISC./83862/2025rejected

Chandan Kumar Ram @ Chandan Ram v. The State Of Bihar

2026-01-17Mr. Justice Rajesh Kumar Verma2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.83862 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-80 Year-2025 Thana- EKMA District- Saran ====================================================== Chandan Kumar Ram @ Chandan Ram Son of Kamehswar Ram Resident of Village- Kohargadh, P.S.- Ekma, District- Saran ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Sanjay Kumar Jha, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Uday Pratap Singh, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH KUMAR VERMA ORAL ORDER 17-01-2026 Heard Mr.Sanjay Kumar Jha, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr.Uday Pratap Singh, learned A.P.P. for the State.

2. The petitioner seeks bail, who is in custody since 01.03.2025 in connection with Ekma P.S. Case No. 80 of 2025, F.I.R. dated 28.02.2025 registered for the offence punishable under Sections 80,238,3(5) of BNS.

3. Allegation against the petitioner is that he alongwith other co-accused persons have in furtherance of their common intention committed the dowry death of the daughter of the informant.

4. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has clean antecedent. The allegation as alleged in the FIR is false and fabricated and the petitioner

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.83862 of 2025(3) dt.17-01-2026 2/2 has not committed any offence as alleged in the FIR. Petitioner has been made accused in the present case merely on the ground that he is husband of the deceased.

5. Learned A.P.P. for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner on the basis of the material available on the record and the case diary and submits that there is direct and specific allegation against the petitioner and apart from that, the petitioner has confessed his guilt in the present occurrence.

6. Considering the aforesaid case, I am not inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail in connection with Ekma P.S. Case No. 80 of 2025 pending in the court of learned Judicial Magistrate-1st Class, Saran at Chapra.

7. Prayer is refused.

(Rajesh Kumar Verma, J) Nitesh/- U T