Munchun Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.85913 of 2023 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-81 Year-2023 Thana- TARIYANI CHOWK District- Sheohar ====================================================== 1.

Munchun Kumar Jokhan Sahni village-Doratola, Sonbarsha, P.S. Tariyani, District-Sheohar 2.

Nanhak Sahni @ Nanhaku Sahni S/o Ishwar Sahni village-Doratola, Sonbarsha, P.S. Tariyani, District-Sheohar 3.

Dhiraj Kumar S/o Nanhak Sahni village-Doratola, Sonbarsha, P.S. Tariyani, District-Sheohar 4.

Renu Devi W/o Nanhak Sahni @ Nanhaku Sahni village-Doratola, Sonbarsha, P.S. Tariyani, District-Sheohar ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar village-Doratola, Sonbarsha, P.S. Tariyani, DistrictSheohar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Sunil Singh, Adv.

For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Anant Kumar 1, APP.

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJANI KUMAR SHARAN ORAL ORDER 18-01-2024 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned A.P.P. for the State.

2. The petitioners apprehend their arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 147, 148, 149, 332, 333, 307, 353, 336, 337 of the Indian Penal Code.

3. Allegedly, all the accused persons including the petitioners are said to have physically and verbally abused the police personnel and created hindrance in discharging their official duty.

4. It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioners that petitioners are quite innocent and have committed no offence. No such occurrence as alleged has ever taken place. Petitioners have

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.85913 of 2023(2) dt.18-01-2024 2/2 been falsely implicated in this case due to ulterior motive. The allegation levelled against the petitioners is not specific rather general and omnibus in nature. The injuries sustained by the injured person is simple in nature. There is no specific overt act against the petitioners. They have no criminal antecedent as mentioned in para-3 of this application.

5. Learned APP for the State opposes the prayer for bail and fairly submits that the nature of the injury sustained by the injured persons is not mentioned in the impugned order.

6. Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, as there is no specific overt act against the petitioners, let the above named petitioners, be released on bail, in the event of their arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of six weeks from today, on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned lower Court where the case is pending/successor Court in connection with Tariyani Chapra P.S. Case No. 81 of 2023, subject to the condition as laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Cr.P.C.

(Anjani Kumar Sharan, J) divyanshi/- U T